
A minor litigant should not ordinarily be subjected to unnecessary or repetitive personal appearances when such attendance serves no effective judicial purpose.
High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh · 25 Aug 2026

Direct eyewitness evidence of the actual murder is not indispensable where a complete and reliable chain of circumstantial evidence establishes guilt.
High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 25 Aug 2026

A failed promise to marry does not automatically constitute rape.
Allahabad High Court · 25 Aug 2026

A person below 18 years of age is a “child” under POCSO, irrespective of whether that person is married.
Kerala High Court · 25 Aug 2026

The allegations did not establish the necessary element of deception from the inception of the transaction required for Section 420 IPC.
Jharkhand High Court · 24 Aug 2026

Under Mohammedan Law, the interest of each heir is separate and distinct and the concept of a Hindu-style joint family or coparcenary does not apply.
Gauhati High Court · 24 Aug 2026

A contract that is inherently determinable cannot ordinarily be specifically enforced.
Bombay High Court · 24 Aug 2026

A minor's right to travel abroad for education cannot be defeated merely because the father's consent is absent, particularly where the child is in the mother's lawful custody and the applicable passport requirements are satisfied.
Rajasthan High Court · 22 Aug 2026

The decision illustrates the balance courts must maintain between the accused's personal liberty and the seriousness of the allegations, particularly in grave offences such as murder.
Delhi High Court · 22 Aug 2026

Rule 3(3) of the PCPNDT Rules does not by itself bar a qualified Radiologist from conducting ultrasonography at clinics located in two different districts.
Orissa High Court · 22 Aug 2026

An ICC's threshold rejection of a sexual-harassment complaint can amount to a recommendation under Section 13 of the POSH Act.
Bombay High Court · 22 Aug 2026

A General Power of Attorney does not convey title in immovable property to the attorney holder.
Delhi High Court · 22 Aug 2026

Personality rights protect individuals from unauthorized commercial exploitation and impersonation, but they cannot be used as a blanket shield against criticism, caricature, lampooning or parody.
Delhi High Court · 22 Aug 2026

Audi alteram partem requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing, not unlimited opportunities.
Patna High Court · 22 Aug 2026