Latest JudgementConstitution of India
VINAY AGGARWAL Vs THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS., 2025
The Supreme Court holds that unsubstantiated claims of police incompetence do not justify transfer of investigation to CBI.
Supreme Court of India·12 April 2025
Constitution of India
Judgement Details
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision
12 April 2025
Judges
Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia ⦁ Justice K. Vinod Chandran
Citation
Acts / Provisions
Section 13(1)(ia), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Section 25, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Facts of the Case
- An FIR was registered against Vinay Aggarwal for allegedly impersonating an Intelligence Bureau officer and extorting ₹1.49 crore from the complainant (Respondent No. 3).
- The complainant moved the Punjab & Haryana High Court, seeking transfer of investigation to the CBI, alleging local police collusion with the accused.
- The High Court allowed the transfer of the case to CBI, citing lack of confidence in the Haryana police.
- The appellant challenged this decision before the Supreme Court.
Issues
- Can a High Court transfer an investigation to the CBI based merely on vague or bald allegations of incompetence or bias against local police?
- What is the threshold for invoking extraordinary jurisdiction for such a transfer?
Held
- CBI investigation not warranted.
- Allegations of bias or incompetence must be backed by material facts.
- The power to transfer investigation should be used sparingly and judiciously.
- Investigation will continue under local police (SIT).
Analysis
- Reinforces the principle of institutional trust in state investigative agencies unless convincingly rebutted.
- Sets a safeguard against frivolous attempts to derail local police investigations.
- Balances the need for credible investigation with judicial restraint in invoking central agencies.
- Reaffirms that CBI is not a remedy for all grievances, especially where routine investigative processes are ongoing.