Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Government of India and Others, 2026
The Supreme Court directed pan-India implementation of the National Policy on Menstrual Hygiene for school-going girls (Classes 6–12).

Judgement Details
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision
30 January 2026
Judges
Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan
Citation
Acts / Provisions
Facts of the Case
-
Petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking provision of free sanitary napkins and functional, gender-segregated toilets in all schools for adolescent girls.
-
The case sought implementation of biodegradable menstrual hygiene products and safe disposal mechanisms in schools.
-
The Union Government and States were directed to formulate action plans under the National Policy on Menstrual Hygiene.
-
Prior interim directions included low-cost sanitary napkins, awareness, sensitization, and safe disposal mechanisms.
-
The Court emphasized the intersection of gender, disability, and structural disadvantage in accessing menstrual hygiene measures.
Issues
-
Whether the unavailability of gender-segregated toilets and non-access to menstrual absorbents violates the right to equality under Article 14?
-
Whether the right to dignified menstrual health is part of the right to life under Article 21?
-
Whether lack of access to menstrual hygiene measures violates the right to participation and equality of opportunity under Article 14?
-
Whether the unavailability of menstrual hygiene measures violates the right to education under Article 21A and the RTE Act?
Judgement
-
The Supreme Court directed pan-India implementation of the National Policy on Menstrual Hygiene for school-going girls (Classes 6–12).
-
Key Directions:
-
All schools must have functional gender-segregated toilets with water and washing facilities.
-
Oxo-biodegradable sanitary napkins to be provided free of cost to all adolescent girls.
-
Establish menstrual hygiene management corners with spare uniforms, pads, and other materials.
-
Safe disposal mechanisms for sanitary waste, including covered wastebins, maintained regularly.
-
Schools must ensure privacy, accessibility, and compliance with ASTM D-6954 standards for sanitary products.
-
States and UTs to coordinate implementation, with special focus on awareness and sensitization.
-
Held
-
The right to menstrual health is part of Article 21 (Right to Life and Dignity).
-
Denial of access to menstrual hygiene measures constitutes structural discrimination, violating Articles 14, 21, 21A.
-
Provision of menstrual hygiene measures is essential for equal participation, education, and bodily autonomy of adolescent girls.
-
Schools, both government-run and private, must comply with national standards or risk derecognition under the RTE Act.
Analysis
-
Recognizes menstrual health as a fundamental right linked to dignity, equality, and education.
-
Affirms intersectional disadvantage gender, disability, socioeconomic status—as a factor in designing policies.
-
Emphasizes substantive equality over formal equality; the State must provide affirmative measures to remove structural barriers.
-
Provides actionable framework: policy implementation, school compliance, and sensitization programs.
-
Aligns with the principle that education is a multiplier right enabling exercise of other fundamental rights.
-
Sets precedent for treating biological realities as human rights issues enforceable by the State.