Delhi High Court Stays BCI’s Decision to Prohibit Lawyer Lokinder Singh Phaugat from Legal Practice

Lexpedia · 8 April 2025 · 2 min read

Delhi High Court Stays BCI’s Decision to Prohibit Lawyer Lokinder Singh Phaugat from Legal Practice
Share:

In a significant development, the Delhi High Court has stayed the Bar Council of India’s (BCI) decision to prohibit Punjab-based lawyer Lokinder Singh Phaugat from practicing law, pending the outcome of a police complaint against him. Justice Mini Pushkarna, while issuing notice on Phaugat's plea, directed that the relevant section of the BCI's order, which barred him from legal practice, shall remain suspended until further notice. The case is scheduled for hearing on August 1, 2025.

BCI’s Original Order and Allegations Against Phaugat
On February 27, 2025, the BCI directed the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana to lodge a police complaint against Phaugat concerning alleged financial misconduct during his tenure as the President of the District Bar Association, Rohtak. The BCI’s order included a directive prohibiting Phaugat from engaging in legal practice, citing concerns that he might tamper with evidence.

Phaugat’s Legal Challenge
Phaugat’s legal team, led by Senior Advocate Mohit Mathur, filed a plea challenging the BCI’s order. The counsel argued that the decision to prohibit Phaugat from practicing law was premature and violated due process. They emphasized that complaints of professional misconduct should be reviewed by the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council before any disciplinary action is taken. Furthermore, no evidence had been presented to support the claim that Phaugat would interfere with the investigation.

The Court’s Interim Order
Justice Mini Pushkarna of the Delhi High Court issued an interim order, suspending the part of the BCI’s February 27 decision that prohibited Phaugat from practicing law. The court granted a stay on this prohibition until the next hearing, scheduled for August 1, 2025.

Implications for the Legal Profession
The case has raised important questions about the procedures followed by the Bar Council of India in dealing with allegations against legal professionals. It also highlights the balance between protecting the integrity of investigations and safeguarding the rights of legal practitioners. The matter is set to be heard further in August, and the final outcome could have significant implications for both Phaugat and the broader legal community in India.

Case Title: Lokinder Singh Phaugat v. Bar Council of India & Ors.