Latest JudgementRajasthan Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011

Victim v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., 2025

The Court balanced the health risks involved in late-term termination against the trauma experienced by the minor, prioritizing medical safety.

Rajasthan High Court·28 August 2025
Victim v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., 2025
Rajasthan Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011
Share:

Judgement Details

Court

Rajasthan High Court

Date of Decision

28 August 2025

Judges

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand

Citation

Acts / Provisions

Section 13(1)(ia), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Section 25, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Facts of the Case

  • The High Court considered the plea for medical termination of pregnancy of a 17-year-old hearing and verbally impaired minor rape survivor carrying a pregnancy of over 32 weeks.

  • The medical board examined the survivor and submitted an adverse opinion indicating serious risks to both the mother and the fetus if termination was permitted.

  • The board noted the fetus had a heartbeat and that due to the minor's weakness, low blood pressure, and blood deficiency, termination would be unsafe and life-threatening.

  • The petitioner's delay in approaching the court aggravated the situation, limiting medical options.

Issues

  1. Whether termination of pregnancy beyond 32 weeks is permissible on medical and legal grounds for a minor rape survivor?

  2. How to balance the rights and health of the minor survivor against the viability of the fetus?

  3. What relief and compensation measures are available for the minor survivor?

Held

  • Medical termination of pregnancy beyond 32 weeks is not permitted where medical opinion warns of serious health risks.

  • The minor rape survivor’s plea was rejected based on medical safety and procedural grounds.

  • The court ensured the minor’s rights through directions for safe delivery, custody arrangements, possible adoption, and victim compensation.

Analysis

  • The Court balanced the health risks involved in late-term termination against the trauma experienced by the minor, prioritizing medical safety.

  • It reinforced legal precedents that termination beyond 20 weeks is generally restricted unless compelling medical reasons exist.

  • The decision highlights the sensitive nature of cases involving minor survivors and the complexities around pregnancy termination laws.

  • It also ensures protective measures for both the mother and the child, along with victim support through compensation.