Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study
Latest JudgementLand Acquisition Act, 1894

Ram Kishan (Since Deceased) Through His LRs Etc. v. State of Haryana & Ors., 2025

The Court enhances land acquisition compensation applying highest exemplar and de-escalation principle.

Supreme Court of India·3 April 2025
Ram Kishan (Since Deceased) Through His LRs Etc. v. State of Haryana & Ors., 2025
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Share:

Judgement Details

Court

Supreme Court of India

Date of Decision

3 April 2025

Judges

Justices BR Gavai KV Viswanathan

Citation

Acts / Provisions

Section 13(1)(ia), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Section 25, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Facts of the Case

  • Land in Dharuhera village (Haryana) was acquired in December 2008 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

  • The High Court fixed compensation at ₹55.71 lakh/acre, relying on lower-priced exemplars.

  • The landowners appealed to the Supreme Court seeking enhanced compensation, citing higher market potential and proximity to developed zones.

  • The land was surrounded by MNCs, residential colonies, schools, and urban infrastructure, indicating high non-agricultural potential.

  • The appellants relied on a 2010 acquisition in a nearby village (BESCO Ltd. case) where compensation was fixed at ₹1.49 crore/acre.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court erred in ignoring the highest bona fide sale exemplar while fixing compensation.

  2. Whether proximity to urban zones and potential for non-agricultural use were adequately considered.

  3. Whether the principle of de-escalation could be applied to align 2010 exemplar prices with the 2008 acquisition.

  4. Whether the compensation should be reduced due to lack of Change of Land Use (CLU) charges paid by the appellants.

 

Held

  • The Court ensured a realistic valuation of urban-adjacent land with strong development potential.

  • The Appeal was allowed. The Compensation for acquired land enhanced to ₹1.18 crore/acre.

  • High Court erred by Ignoring urban potentiality & Relying only on low-value sale exemplars and Not applying the de-escalation principle correctly.

Analysis

  • The Court ensured a realistic valuation of urban-adjacent land with strong development potential.

  • Cited Mehrawal Khewaji Trust to justify preference for highest exemplar.

  • The Court standardized the 12% de-escalation rate, ensuring consistency with the BESCO Ltd. case.

  • Adjusted for non-CLU payment, maintaining equity between appellants and BESCO claimants.

  • Reiterated that future utility of land is as critical as current usage in compensation assessments.