Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Internet Prices

The Supreme Court of India today dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought the regulation of internet prices in the country. The bench, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, was hearing the case filed by Rajat, who appeared as a petitioner-in-person.

Arguments Presented in Court

• At the outset, the CJI pointed out that there are multiple options available for consumers when it comes to internet services. He explained that the Indian market offers a diverse range of services, including LAN, wired internet, BSNL, and MTNL. The CJI emphasized that it is a free market, and consumers can choose from a variety of internet service providers.
• However, the petitioner argued that while these options exist, Reliance Jio dominates the market with an overwhelming share of 80%. Rajat contended that Jio has a monopoly-like hold over the internet sector in India, and therefore, prices should be regulated.
• In response, the CJI interjected, suggesting that the petitioner could approach the Competition Commission of India (CCI) if he believed there was an issue with market competition. The CJI emphasized that the court’s jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution was not meant for such matters, urging the petitioner to consider other avenues for resolution.

Court’s Order

The bench, after hearing the arguments, dismissed the petition. The Court passed the following order:

"We are not inclined to entertain the present petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The petition is dismissed. We, however, clarify that in case the petitioner wishes to seek recourse through appropriate statutory remedies, he is at liberty to do so. We make no comments in this regard."

Conclusion

While the Supreme Court dismissed the PIL, it granted liberty to the petitioner to approach other forums such as the Competition Commission of India for resolution of the issues raised. The Court refrained from commenting further on the matter, emphasizing the availability of alternative statutory remedies for the petitioner.

This dismissal highlights the Court’s cautious approach in matters related to economic regulation, particularly where market competition and consumer choice are involved.

Case Details: RAJAT vs. UNION OF INDIA W.P.(C) No. 000136 / 2025