Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study
Legal News
Judgements
Articles
Syllabus
Bare Acts
Exam Notifications
Legal NewsArticlesBare Acts
Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study

India's most comprehensive legal exam preparation platform. Prepare for Judiciary, UGC NET, AIBE, CLAT and more.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store

Follow Us

Exams

  • Judiciary Exams
  • UGC NET Law
  • AIBE
  • CLAT / LLB Entrance
  • LLM Entrance
  • ADA / APP / APO

Resources

  • Legal News
  • Latest Judgements
  • Landmark Judgements
  • Legal Articles
  • Exam Notifications
  • Bare Acts
  • Syllabus

Company

  • About Lexpedia
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refund Policy

Partner with Us

Advertise with Lexpedia

Reach 1M+ law students across India

Share PYQs with Us

Help students succeed — upload papers

© 2026 Lexpedia. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTermsRefund
Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study
Legal News
Judgements
Articles
Syllabus
Bare Acts
Exam Notifications
Legal NewsArticlesBare Acts
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. ECI Clarifies: Aadhaar Only for Identity Verification, Not Citizenship

ECI Clarifies: Aadhaar Only for Identity Verification, Not Citizenship

· 18 November 2025 · 3 min read

ECI Clarifies: Aadhaar Only for Identity Verification, Not Citizenship
Share:

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has reiterated before the Supreme Court that the Aadhaar card is being used solely to verify the identity of applicants seeking inclusion in electoral rolls, and not as proof of citizenship.

Background of the Case

The statement was made in response to an interlocutory application filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, who sought a direction against the use of Aadhaar as proof of date of birth in Form 6, used for registering new voters. The ECI clarified that Aadhaar is only being used as a proof of identity under Section 23(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

Amendments and Legal Framework

In its affidavit, sworn by Santosh Kumar Dubey, Secretary of the ECI, the Commission stated that the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021, amended Section 23 of the RP Act to enable linking electoral roll data with the Aadhaar ecosystem. The aim was to curb multiple enrolments of the same individual at different locations. Based on this amendment, Form 6 was also revised, effective June 17, 2022.

Clarifications from UIDAI and Court Judgments

The affidavit referred to the Office Memorandum (O.M.) dated August 22, 2023, from the UIDAI, which clarified that Aadhaar is not proof of citizenship, residence, or date of birth. Section 9 of the Aadhaar Act, 2016, also states that an Aadhaar number is not proof of citizenship or residence.

The ECI cited the Bombay High Court judgment in State of Maharashtra v. UIDAI (Criminal Writ Petition No. 3002 of 2022), which held that Aadhaar cannot be treated as proof of date of birth. Additionally, the Supreme Court, in Saroj v. IFFCO Tokio (2024), preferred a School Leaving Certificate over Aadhaar for determining age.

The ECI also highlighted the Supreme Court order dated September 8, 2025, in the Bihar SIR matter, which allowed the use of Aadhaar as one of the documents for enumeration, but clarified it may be used only for identity verification in deciding inclusion or exclusion from electoral rolls.

ECI Instructions to Chief Electoral Officers

Following the Court’s direction, the ECI issued instructions on September 9, 2025, to all Chief Electoral Officers to use Aadhaar only as proof of identity, and not as proof of citizenship, in accordance with Section 9 of the Aadhaar Act, 2016, and Section 23(4) of the RP Act, 1950, for inclusion or exclusion in the revised voter list of Bihar.

Supreme Court Observations

Responding to Upadhyay’s plea to restrict Aadhaar strictly to identity verification and bar its use as proof of date of birth in Form-6, the ECI stated that the existing legal framework already limits Aadhaar to identity purposes, and its instructions fully align with the statutory provisions of the RP Act, 1950, and Aadhaar Act, 2016.

During last week’s hearing, the Supreme Court told Ashwini Upadhyay that as long as Section 23(4) of the RP Act allows the use of Aadhaar as identity proof, its use in Form 6 cannot be barred. The Court also clarified that a notification issued by UIDAI cannot override the statutory provision.

Case Title: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India and Ors

ElectionCitizenshipCitizenship Act

Related Legal News

Advocate Devvrat Elected President Of Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association; Nikhil Jain & Yugandhara Pawar Jha Win Key Posts

21 May 2026 · Lexpedia News

Madras High Court Questions ECI During Special Sunday Hearing Over ‘One Vote’ Tiruppattur Election Dispute

10 May 2026 · Lexpedia News

Former Calcutta High Court Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam Resigns From SIR Appellate Tribunal In West Bengal

7 May 2026 · Lexpedia News

Supreme Court Declines to Mandate Compulsory Voting, Holds Participation Cannot Be Enforced by Law

16 April 2026 · Lexpedia News

Latest Articles

MONTHLY MAGAZINE APRIL, 2026

Lexpedia News

MONTHLY MAGAZINE MARCH

Lexpedia News

MONTHLY MAGAZINE FEBRUARY

Lexpedia News

MONTHLY MAGAZINE JANUARY

Lexpedia

Preamble to the Constitution of India and the Constituent Assembly: Foundation of Indian Democracy

Lexpedia News

Lexpedia — Digital Smart Study

India's most comprehensive legal exam preparation platform. Prepare for Judiciary, UGC NET, AIBE, CLAT and more.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store

Follow Us

Exams

  • Judiciary Exams
  • UGC NET Law
  • AIBE
  • CLAT / LLB Entrance
  • LLM Entrance
  • ADA / APP / APO

Resources

  • Legal News
  • Latest Judgements
  • Landmark Judgements
  • Legal Articles
  • Exam Notifications
  • Bare Acts
  • Syllabus

Company

  • About Lexpedia
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Refund Policy

Partner with Us

Advertise with Lexpedia

Reach 1M+ law students across India

Share PYQs with Us

Help students succeed — upload papers

© 2026 Lexpedia. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTermsRefund