X v. Y, 2026
The Interim maintenance is meant to protect the dependent spouse, and mere allegations without proof do not suffice to deny relief.
Judgement Details
Court
Delhi High Court
Date of Decision
10 January 2026
Judges
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma
Citation
Acts / Provisions
Section 13(1)(ia), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Section 25, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Facts of the Case
-
The parties were married in 2021 as per Muslim rites; no child was born out of wedlock.
-
The wife claimed to be a housewife, with no movable or immovable property and wholly dependent on her parental family.
-
The wife had studied only up to 11th standard.
-
The husband allegedly earned Rs. 25,000 per month as a teacher in a private school.
-
Husband contended that the wife had voluntarily left the matrimonial home and was working as a nursery teacher, earning Rs. 10,000 per month.
-
Family Court had granted Rs. 2,500 per month as interim maintenance to the wife.
-
Husband challenged this, claiming the wife could maintain herself and disputing the quantum of maintenance.
-
No documentary proof was produced by the husband to substantiate his claims regarding the wife’s income.
Issues
-
Whether a wife can be presumed to be earning or capable of maintaining herself for the purpose of interim maintenance?
-
Whether the husband’s bald assertion of the wife’s alleged income without supporting evidence can be relied upon at the interim stage?
-
Whether the income of the husband should be assessed based on minimum wages in determining the quantum of interim maintenance?
Held
-
Wife is entitled to interim maintenance without presumption of her ability to maintain herself.
-
Husband’s unsubstantiated claims of wife’s income cannot reduce maintenance.
-
Husband’s income must be assessed based on minimum wages to determine interim maintenance.
Analysis
- Interim maintenance is meant to protect the dependent spouse, and mere allegations without proof do not suffice to deny relief.
-
Principles under Section 125 Cr.P.C., including capability to maintain self, bald assertions vs. evidence, and assessment of income based on minimum wages.
-
Reinforces that financial capability of wife cannot be presumed, especially for interim maintenance; encourages evidence-based arguments regarding income; guides lower courts to consider minimum wages when assessing husband’s earning potential.